Matthew Forbes vs Ryan Dickerson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Forbes has excelled in winning second serve points recently, achieving a 44.8% win rate, while Dickerson leads slightly with 45.08%. Does this slight edge favor Dickerson? It does, as even marginal advantages in serve points can be crucial.
• In return games, Forbes is less proficient, winning 41.86% and 20.23% of opponent's second and first serve points, compared to Dickerson's more robust 49.06% and 28.66% respectively. This suggests Dickerson’s return game represents a key strength in their play.
• Under pressure, Dickerson has shown greater resilience, saving 53.4% of breakpoints versus Forbes's 48.72%. Could this indicate better performance under high-stakes conditions? Likely, as breakpoint save percentages are pivotal under pressure.
• When comparing overall performance, Dickerson's win rate of 59.57% over the last year starkly contrasts with Forbes’s 30%. Could this be the deciding factor? Indeed, as the win-loss record indicates form consistency.
• Performance analysis on different surfaces shows that Forbes is most successful on Hard surfaces, whereas Dickerson shows significant advantage on Clay surfaces, making surface type a relevant factor in determining the potential match outcome.
• In terms of the quality of opponents, Dickerson has faced tougher competitors with an average rank of 224.3, while Forbes’s opponents averaged a rank of 301.7, hinting at Dickerson’s experience in higher-level matchups.
• Head-to-head records indicate Forbes currently leads with one victory over Dickerson from their sole encounter. Does this grant Forbes a psychological edge? Possibly, considering past victories can impact player confidence.
• For deciding sets, Dickerson has proven more effective, winning 29% over the past year, compared to Forbes’s winless streak, suggesting greater endurance and composure in tightly contested matches.
• In break point conversions, Forbes is more successful, converting 50% of opportunities compared to Dickerson's 38.84%, which could be influential in critical match junctures.

Editorial Prediction (July 25, 2025, UTC):

As we examine the comprehensive stats, Dickerson demonstrates a marginal edge over Forbes in several areas, including second serve points, return game performance, and ability to save breakpoints under pressure. These factors contribute significantly to competitive play.

Forbes holds a victory in their only head-to-head match, providing a psychological advantage. However, Dickerson's broader performance context against higher-ranked opponents and superior stats in deciding sets bolster their competitive stance.

Surface preference—particularly Forbes's disadvantage on Clay and the match's surface details—could shift the dynamics in favor of Dickerson, given their strong proficiency on the surface.

Taking into account all the data and current form, Dickerson appears to be the prospective winner of the upcoming tennis match.